Luther Man Between God and the Devil Review
See a Problem?
Cheers for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Exist the first to ask a question most Luther
Community Reviews
Luther: Human Between God And The Devil is the definitive biography of the key figure of the Protestant Reformation. Published in 1982 in Germany to great acclaim, the book portrays the controversial reformer in the context of his ain fourth dimension. Oberman argues that Luther is more than the medieval monk than history has ordinarily regarded him. Haunted past the devil, Luther saw the world, Oberman claims, as a cosmic battleground between God and S Luther: man between God and the devil, Heiko Augustinus Oberman
Luther: Homo Between God And The Devil is the definitive biography of the central effigy of the Protestant Reformation. Published in 1982 in Deutschland to great acclamation, the volume portrays the controversial reformer in the context of his own time. Oberman argues that Luther is more the medieval monk than history has usually regarded him. Haunted by the devil, Luther saw the world, Oberman claims, as a catholic battleground between God and Satan. It is this battle with the devil that provides the key to understanding the man. This is a classic in biography and an indispensable work for all interested in one of the greatest figures of Western history.
تاریخ نخستین خوانش: دهم ماه آگوست سال 2014 میلادی
عنوان: لوتر، مردی میان خدا و شیطان؛ اثر: هیکو اوبرمان؛ مترجمها: ابوتراب سهراب، فریدالدین رادمهر؛ تهران، چشمه، چاپ دوم 1387، در 614 صفحه، مصور، نقشه، شابک: 9789643622862؛ فروست: تحقیق و بررسی 47؛ چاپ قبلی 1385 در 635 ص؛ کتابنامه بصورت زیرنویس دارد؛ موضوع: مارتین لوتر 1483 تا 1546 م، اصلاح دین - آلمان، سرگذشتنامه - نگارش کتاب سده 20 م
کتاب شرح زندگانی، افکار، و آراء مارتین لوتر ـ بانی نهضت پروتستان ـ است. به تصریح کتاب: مارتین لوتر، بانی نهضت پروتستان، در زمره ی معدود کسانی ست که سبب تغییر عمده در تاریخ شدند. ایشان با شهامت بسیار در اصول عقاید مسیحی، که بیش از هزاروپانصد سال باور همگان از مسیحیان بود، درنگ کرد و آنها را به بوته ی نقد و آزمون کشید. نیمی از شخصیت ایشان ریشه در باورهای قرون وسطی رد اروپا داشت، و نیم دیگرش به دنیای نوی روی داشت که تحول در علم و آگاهی را به ارمغان آورد... اندیشه ی لوتر بر همگان موثر افتاد، و دغدغه ی همه ی روشن اندیشان گشت. پس از او بود که به سرعت شگرف چهره ی عالم دیگر شد. انسانها قصد فضا کردند و از صومعه ها وکلیساها برای آبادانی دنیا بیرون آمدند. فلسفه تغییر روش داد و علوم نوین زاده شدند. گویی لوتر نوری بر دنیا افکند که همه چیز در پرتو آن نور عیان گشت؛ کانت و هگل از ایشان تاثیر گرفتند و رودلف اوتو و کارل بارث در پی ایشان رفتند. شلایر ماخر رای از او گرفت و بر آن افزود و مارتین پوپر اگرچه از ایشان الهام گرفت ولی اهتمام نمود و بار دیگر انجیل را به آلمانی ترجمه کرد. وبر از تاثیر نهضت پروتستان بر اقتصاد و سرمایه داری گفت، و نیچه صراحت لحن او را آموخت؛ در حالی که شوپنهاور طعن گزنده ی همو را به کار میبرد، پل تیلیخ از آموزه های او گفت، و علم کلام دیگر برخاست. هایدگر او را ستود و کی یر که گور نیز از او سخن گفت. خلاصه، موافق یا مخالف نمیتوانستند آثار او را نادیده بگیرند، زیرا او در تاریخ ظاهر شده بود. گفتنی است، مترجمان علاوه بر ترجمه ی کتاب، در ضمیمه بر آن افزوده اند؛ یکی مربوط به مساله ی بخشایش گناهان و فروش بخشایش است که مساله ی حیاتی و اصلی جنبش لوتری محسوب میگردد؛ و دیگری، متن نامه ی یکصدونودوپنج ماده ای است که انفصال ایشان را از کلیسا حتمی کرد. ا. شربیانی ...more than
If you look at the tabular array of contents you volition encounter 3 parts. The kickoff explains the events in which Luther figured a
This is a volume to be read with conscientious attention. It is not ordered strictly chronologically. Rather, it is structured around sure strands of the story Oberman wishes to emphasize. The master events of Luther'due south life take several layers, and by treating individually, Oberman tin give a greater sense of the complexity of the whole. The issue is a deeper take on a familiar figure.If you expect at the table of contents you volition see three parts. The first explains the events in which Luther figured as German, Medieval and elemental. For example, the reformation as a German language effect is a wait at the politics of the situation. The reformation as a Medieval result is a await at the continuities with the past--that from which this new thing arose. In the second department Oberman goes into Luther's influences more, and shows how his thought inverse over fourth dimension. The third section deals with the problems facing Luther once the intermission was made and there was no render. He however deals with individual problems diachronically, such as Luther and matrimony, a most interesting chapter. And in the end he evaluates the reformer.
It is hard to call back how whatever biography of Luther tin can be more readable (a good English translation), more intelligently ordered to provide the facts a maximum of meaning, or, curiously enough, meliorate illustrated. Rather than include a section of glossy paintings and woodcuts in the center of the book, the illustrations are lavishly scattered at the point of the text with which they have to do. It dampens the effect of some of the paintings, only since most of the illustrations are woodcuts and frontispieces, it works.
...more
Having said this, I would not recommend it as a first biography to read on Martin Luther as Heiko Oberman is not a neutral writer. The best biography IMO is Brecht's iii volume monument, and Brecht lets Luther and his contemporaries speak for themselves with copious quotes from main sources. However, information technology is Oberman's opinions and judgements than made me particularly bask this biography.
I've read near a dozen biographies on the German reformer, Martin Luther, and this is i of the best ones.Having said this, I would non recommend it as a first biography to read on Martin Luther as Heiko Oberman is non a neutral writer. The best biography IMO is Brecht's 3 volume monument, and Brecht lets Luther and his contemporaries speak for themselves with copious quotes from primary sources. However, information technology is Oberman's opinions and judgements than made me specially enjoy this biography. I would recommend this as a second or third biography on Luther to read.
Oberman knows his stuff and I appreciated him sifting through the endless fabric at that place is on Luther to give expert qualified judgement calls on Luther's life & work. Oberman works hard at getting you to meet Luther in the context of his times instead of looking at Luther with modernistic post-enlightenment mindset. This is the particular strength of this biography. And also many Luther biographies simply look at the Reformation from a theological viewpoint, missing out the massive political, social and economic changes that were happening in the 15th & 16th centuries. Heiko Oberman gives the best overview and contextual understanding of this era that I have read in a Luther biography.
Like well-nigh all Luther biographies, the bulk of the volume focuses on pivotal years of Luther making his theological breakthroughs as a monk, and so as a professor of theology at Wittenburg, followed by his clashes with the Rome power base and papal advocates. The capacity are thematic rather than chronological (another reason to read Brecht first), though a timeline is provided at the back.
It was a joy to read this biography, after reading and so many over the last decade, and still gain so many new insights. Warmly recommended.
...more
I wouldn't recommend this as an introductory piece of work on Luther. The way the material is organized is only loosely chronological. It would be quite hard to follow for anyone with little prior cognition of Luther, simply it's a fairly solid follow up to any of the other basic introductions to Luther.
Final note: Information technology shouldn't be a
A good book - especially helpful in grasping the groundwork to the Reformation. Oberman includes details and information that might be lacking in other bones biographies.I wouldn't recommend this every bit an introductory work on Luther. The way the material is organized is only loosely chronological. It would be quite difficult to follow for anyone with little prior knowledge of Luther, only it's a fairly solid follow upwardly to any of the other basic introductions to Luther.
Final note: It shouldn't exist a surprise to anyone who knows much about Luther, but there is occasional coarse linguistic communication in some quotations of Luther. It is less than what many people hither in an average twenty-four hour period and no doubtfulness a fairly mild representation of Luther's own apply of linguistic communication, only it'due south something to exist enlightened of.
...more than 
This is no hagiography. Luther's warts and wrinkles are laid bare as he saw them and as history has recognized them. But in Oberman's telling, that only makes it far more amazing that God should use him as He did. Readers of Bainton will accept in mitt a 2d map of the path Luther'south life followed; readers of Oberman will get a glimpse of the countryside, the contents of his pack, the sweat upon his brow, and the influence of his young man travelers.
...more
The author's thesis is that Luther's viewpoint was fundamentally medieval and that he saw the Devil as a profound and direct presence in the world.
I call back that this strange viewpoint (likewise as his considerable anti-Semitism and virulent anger) were the main reasons that I was turned off by him. I have to admit that I establish Luther a bit deadening equally an individual, although a man of admirable courage.
The author's thesis is that Luther'due south viewpoint was fundamentally medieval and that he saw the Devil equally a profound and directly presence in the world.
I think that this foreign viewpoint (as well every bit his considerable anti-Semitism and virulent anger) were the main reasons that I was turned off by him. ...more
Oberman is telling yous that his piece of work is non
Oberman dedicated his book to Roland Bainton, and that should serve as a inkling. If y'all have not already done so you lot should become and read Bainton's seminal Here I Stand up to sympathise the basic biography of Luther's life and why it was that returning to a Biblical agreement of justification by faith changes everything: everything yous believe and everything about the life y'all live. Bainton's book certainly had that effect on me equally a new Christian in 1990.Oberman is telling you that his piece of work is not for the novice. It assumes you lot know the bones outline of Luther's life and theology. If you do, it pays rich rewards. Written by a Dutchman, originally in German, the translation was extensively worked on by Oberman himself. Oberman was, it appears, an ordained minister in the mainline Dutch Reformed Church.
His essential thesis is Luther thought of life more overtly as a conflict with Satan than we do and agreement this will assist us contextualise the urgency and vehemency with which Luther went near his chore. Luther moves from seeing Satan active in the Roman church, so reform is sought within it, to seeing Satan controlling the unreformable Roman church so that it should exist opposed root and co-operative, called out for the apostate body that information technology is.
Opposition to Satan collection even the desire for marriage. Satan has a field day with the unnecessary endeavour at celibacy via monastic vows and the concomitant denigration of married life every bit less spiritual. Marrying therefore becomes a duty to spite Satan'southward attempts to divert people from serving God in marriage and finding their salvation in Christ.
And then Satan's malevolent designs are turned around in the gospel. How practise you lot talk to the Devil when he wants to accept a conversation with you lot? He wants to persuade y'all that you have committed terrible sins. Don't deny it. If you had non sinned Christ would not accept died taking your sins from you.
Satan was raging and had brought the professing church building to the depths of idolatrous ruin because the return of Christ was imminent. Luther was thus sure his task was urgent. With time so short why compress from boldly proclaiming the truth and opposing falsehood. The worst that could happen was martyrdom just why worry if that occurs since Christ would be raising you from the dead in a few years.
Oberman has an interesting perspective on Luther's later works confronting the Jews. As harsh equally these are in our eyes, at the fourth dimension they were milder than most writing on the Jews which simply called for their extermination. Luther never went and then far as this, though he did advocate stripping Jews of what lilliputian ceremonious rights they had until they had learned honest Christian behaviour.
Ane topic where Oberman, mayhap predictably, goes awry is scripture. He tries to put Luther on 1 side and Erasmus, Bernard of Clairvaux and Calvin on the other. Scripture for the sometime shows human's dependence on God against Satan, and for the latter is a program for club. That is a dichotomy Calvin, I am sure, knew not, nonetheless much later Lutheran theology soft-pedalled Scriptural godliness for rulers; and to be fair to Luther he did non make that mistake either, clearly telling the German nobility how they ought to rule to please God.
The prose in the book is constantly thought-provoking, regularly needing time to ponder the implications of Luther's pedagogy. 'The Christian walks a 'straight and narrow way'. This is non a reference to the "directly gate" and "narrow fashion of those monks and puritans who forego the joys of life on the "broad manner" so as to maintain clear consciences. No, it is a difficult, a painful path because it leads to the nearly mystical feel of being torn out of one's conscience, the conscience that seeks peace in its own holiness. Centuries of Western formation of conscience must be overcome if saying yep to God means proverb no to one's ain censor."
The misunderstanding of puritans aside, he means legalists, this is a brilliant clarification of how nosotros detect our censor satisfied outside of us in Christ, and not in our own mucky attempts at purity.
So, if you relish Luther, have upward and read and benefit from seeing the urgency of the Christian task and so that God may triumph over Satan in all you practice.
...more
I know that Oberman was likely Dutch Reformed, not Lutheran, but, he conspicuously takes Luther at face value, including his man being like a mule
How I missed this when it came out, I don't know. It'southward a shame to it that my conservative Lutheran college didn't talk over this in whatever faith classes I took at that place. Given that it was still just six years erstwhile when I entered my bourgeois Lutheran seminary, it'south fifty-fifty more than a discredit to Concordia Seminary to not have this book discussed in any classes there.I know that Oberman was likely Dutch Reformed, non Lutheran, but, he clearly takes Luther at face value, including his man beingness like a mule ridden past either god or devil, and takes seriously what Luther intended by that.
And, he's got the theological chops to know Luther's history.
Even without him making connections, I now run into that his reading Hutton's edition of Valla exposing the Donation of Constantine as a forgery may well take upped not "merely" Luther's general antipathy to the papacy, only his seeing it as Antichrist. In turn, that meant to him that the end times were here.
I demand to digress at that place for a moment. The "antichrist," or actually "antichrists" of I John are not the same as I Thessalonians' "man of lawlessness," but the term has become ascribed to that existence. Rather, writing at least xl years after Paul, and maybe 60, the author of I John seems to exist referring to a male monarch-sized "alligator" in a church or something similar that, not a quasi-metaphysical entity. Digression washed.
At the same time, Oberman'due south book falls short in some ways.
Hither's one. If Luther wasn't well-nigh as literalistic almost "sola Scriptura" as the Scofield reference bible, then on what grounds was he right and the Schwärmerei wrong? On what basis were the Reformed wrong (and Karlstadt) and him right on the Eucharist, since Karlstadt had proven him wrong on the "this is" per Greek grammer?
None other than Luther beingness a cross stubborn mule.
For that affair, since Master Melanchthon was the professor of Greek at Wittenberg, why didn't HE challenge Luther like Karlstasdt did? (Roper could accept done some psychoanalysis with THAT in her book.)
Also, Oberman reports Luther myth equally fact even equally religious historians and theological scholars were challenging it by the time he wrote this book. I talk specifically of the nailing of the 95 Theses and the "here I stand up" at Worms equally fact, when near certainly neither are.
Does it matter? In the second case, it's more than something of pietistic hagiography. Just, Oberman cuts through that on other things.
On the Theses? Yep information technology matters. Goes to motive, or similar. If they were never nailed to a door, how did they get public so quickly, and what hand did Luther have in that?
Otherwise, the volume is spot on about aspects of Luther'south life Oberman covers. He is indeed an existentialist, only not Kierkegaard, let alone Sartre. He does take i pes in the medieval earth and literalistic beliefs non even Kierkegaard did.
BUT … per the higher up, Oberman covers very little about Luther's interactions with others. Much less than Roper on Karlstadt or the Reformed. Cipher on the Peasants Revolts or Muntzer et al.
And so, five stars for what he covers. 3 stars for what he doesn't and for repeating Luther fable. We're at a disappointing 4 stars.
...more
He was, by all accounts, i of the well-nigh influential figures of Christian history -- maybe of world history. He is attributed to be the pioneer of the Protestant Reformation -- something he failed to run into the fruition of. Even at his deathbed, Luther was on trial: Will he stand up by what he wrote and taught since 1517? "Yes," Luther replied. He was just as clear as he was assuming at the end of Diet of Worms: "My conscience is convict to the Word of God. Thus I cannot
Martin Luther: Who was this man?He was, by all accounts, ane of the about influential figures of Christian history -- perhaps of world history. He is attributed to be the pioneer of the Protestant Reformation -- something he failed to see the fruition of. Even at his deathbed, Luther was on trial: Will he stand by what he wrote and taught since 1517? "Yes," Luther replied. He was just as clear as he was bold at the stop of Diet of Worms: "My conscience is captive to the Discussion of God. Thus I cannot and will non recant, for going against my conscience is neither safe nor salutary. I tin can do no other, here I stand, God help me. Amen." These are words thick with revolutionary power, but a revolution was the last thing Luther wanted. Instead, Luther wanted true repentance and reconciliation through reformation within the Catholic Church -- not excommunication from them. Indeed, he was caught between the Pope, the Crown, and the Intellectual elites. Or, from Luther'south perspective, he was caught betwixt God and the devil.
1 of Luther'south core convictions is that everyone is a beggar before God. All that we are and hope to be depend on God, and on our own, we are nothing. But God is lavishly generous. We might be beggars before God, but God is most certainly gracious towards u.s.a..
Calling the pope, or anyone, the Anti-Christ or Devil'southward bounder is not proper etiquette. Luther's language was vulgar and virulent. When he attacked, he attacked fiercely, sometimes too far and too wrong, peculiarly his anti-semitic rhetoric towards the end of his life. His volatile language and behavior have had some scholars diagnosis Luther with psychosis and schizophrenia. And Oberman goes to peachy length to undo this extravaganza. Luther was not psychotic, but he was certainly expressive and zealous. Luther's colorful German, however, was also a gift: he painstakingly translated the inaccessible Latin Bible — the Vulgate — into vernacular German.
Luther was astoundingly prolific. Luther's Works is a massive 55-volume set up, with the index being 462 pages long! Approaching this towering effigy can be — should be — intimidating. But thank God for Heiko A. Oberman and translator Eileen Walliser-Schwarzbart. The translation is but fantastic: not only was this biography accessible but likewise captivating. Oberman's biography of Luther is superb, though I wish for more of Luther's theological development.
cf. www.sooholee.com
...more
Is at that place another scholar, accessible in English, who knew as much about the life and times of Martin Luther? For those who endure from the lack of primary linguistic communication source material, any serious meet or accounting of Luther, in my estimation, must read Oberman's volume. If Oberman presents, and masterfully then, an appraisal of Luther in his context, another recent book, Luther Renegade and Prophet past Lyndal Roper (a student of Oberman) could be said to provide a sense of what Luther might mean for us today. Roper's account does not seem equally fluid in knowledge of Reformation theology (and she acknowledges the mastery of Oberman), she, nonetheless, presents an astoundingly bright portrait of Luther as a person by which we today tin can lay agree of his personality, and, in this way, nosotros can gain an attribute of what Luther might mean for us today, fulfilling the second task of hermeneutics. While Oberman'due south volume may take a fiddling more than work for the adventurous lay person, reading these two volumes will provide an admirably adequate, non-specialist's account of this man and historically important figure.
...more
A few quotes from the
"Health is God's domain; expiry the Devil's intent." Luther would oftentimes gain strength in battle past specifically focusing on defying the Devil and refusing to allow him any victories. This is often where Luther gained strength in order to go along fighting his constant concrete ailments, besides as was able to relish the beautiful things in life, such as a rose. By persevering through physical hurting and stopping to admire God'due south creation, Luther was spitting in the Devil's face.A few quotes from the book..
"God is so far higher up united states of america that we can never grasp more than a function of His truth; for the truly pious, that is enough."
"... justification by faith alone (sola fide), the preaching of God'due south discussion alone (sola scriptura), and Trust in God'south grace alone (sola gratia)."
"The thrilled expectation of discovering God'southward Discussion in the Scriptures could become reality only through the interpreter's inner dedication in prayer and meditation combined with intensive scholarly work on the text."
"Whoever wants to read the Bible must brand sure he is not incorrect, for the Scriptures tin can hands be stretched and guided, merely no i should guide them according to his emotions; he should lead them to the well, that is to the cantankerous of Christ, and so he will certainly exist right and cannot fail."
...more than
Best (modernistic) book I've ever read, hands downwards. I picked upwardly this book looking for a fair assessment of Luther equally a man, and the subtitle "Human between God and the Devil" gave me promise for such an assessment. And it didn't disappoint, though I'm surprised at how much admiration for Luther was evoked in me through the reading of the volume.
I believe Oberman is however overly-praising and under-crit Just coincidence that I finished this book on the 500th anniversary of Luther'due south posting of the 95 Theses...
Best (modern) book I've always read, hands down. I picked upward this book looking for a fair assessment of Luther equally a man, and the subtitle "Man betwixt God and the Devil" gave me promise for such an assessment. And information technology didn't disappoint, though I'thou surprised at how much admiration for Luther was evoked in me through the reading of the book.
I believe Oberman is withal overly-praising and under-critical of Luther at times, but makes up for it with brutal honesty about Luther's biggest shortcomings (an approval of bigamy he failed to denounce though, glaringly).
Almost every page acquired me to suspension, think, write downwardly a quote, look up a word...truly intriguing writing. Masterful, genius even. I'd recommend this volume to anyone, but I warn you: information technology's completion and understanding is a job, and afterwards all "nosotros are beggars--that is true!" ...more
News & Interviews
Welcome back. Merely a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads business relationship.
sandersrappostion.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/647611.Luther
Belum ada Komentar untuk "Luther Man Between God and the Devil Review"
Posting Komentar